CCA Florida Seawatch
The official publication of the Coastal Conservation Association Florida


 

SEAWATCH July 2003 Issue #96

 

Turquoise_and_Gray2001.gif (1558 bytes)

Table of Contents:

SeaWatch - CCA Florida's Official Newsletter

Fish Trappers Getting Snagged in the Big Bend

by Rick Farren, Communications Director of CCA Florida

With the use of computer chip technology wildlife officers are making life difficult for outlaw fish trappers in the Gulf of Mexico.

Law enforcement officers have introduced a new tool in their effort to curb illegal fish trapping in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. The result—an arrest of two major trap poachers and confiscation of more than a ton of illegally caught reef fish.

Dubbed Operation Red Trap, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission officers first located a dozen illegal fish traps about 25 miles west of Steinhatchee. They pulled some of the traps, marked the fish with data chips, and returned the traps to their original locations. After plainclothes officers observed a vessel pulling the traps they moved in and escorted the trappers to a fish house.

At the dock—to the surprise of the poachers and a small crowd of local fishermen—the officers pulled out a hand held scanner and quickly located one of the marked fish. The chip was crossed referenced with the latitude and longitude of the trap and added to the evidence.


The two illegal trappers were arrested and their catch of 2,126 pounds of grouper, grunts and sea bass was confiscated. More important, illegal trappers working in the northern Gulf now have to wonder which fish in their traps could lead to their arrest.

Operation Red Trap is the most recent episode in a year-long effort by the FWC to reduce rampant illegal fish trapping in the Big Bend region of the Panhandle. So far they’ve confiscated more than 100 illegal fish traps and issued more than a dozen arrest citations.

The trappers are mostly harvesting red grouper, black sea bass and white grunts for commercial markets. “It’s been ongoing for years and it’s an enormous abuse of our Gulf resources,” said Lt. Bruce Cooper, Taylor County Watch Commander.

The illegal trapping is taking place in the Gulf of Mexico Stressed Area which along the Big Bend is a designated strip of federal water between state waters (nine miles offshore) and the ten-fathom break (approximately 20 miles offshore). The area is closed to trapping by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) because of the considerable fishing pressure it receives. Fish trapping is legal for permitted commercial fishermen in the federal waters of the eastern Gulf of Mexico outside of the Stressed Area. Only pinfish and sea bass traps are legal in state waters.

To disguise their activities, the trappers typically use a “pop-up” device which consists of a zinc strip that’s used to hold together a loop in the buoy line and keep the buoy underwater. The zinc slowly dissolves over a predetermined period of time and the buoy simply pops to the surface. They also use camouflaged buoys that are made of regular crab trap buoys cut in half, painted black or blue, and tied so the flat side stays up.


All trapping cases in the federal Stressed Area, whether made by state or federal officers, are handled administratively by the National Marine Fisheries Service, which has been handing down fines of between $3,000 and $7,000.

One of the most important factors in the FWC’s successful anti-trapping efforts was the commissioning last year of a 27-foot Edgewater which allows officers to safely work offshore for longer periods of time. They also now have the use of advanced radar and plotting equipment to help locate trappers from a distance.

“These trap details head offshore at 6 a.m. and usually aren’t back until midnight,” said Cooper, adding, “We’re not going to let up, not while there are so many traps still out there.”

If you spot an illegal trap
Fishermen who spot an illegal fish trap are requested not to pull the trap or cut the buoy line. Cutting the line merely creates a ghost trap which can continue self-baiting and killing for years. Worse, most illegal traps don’t contain a biodegradable escape hatch that’s required for legal traps. Instead, note latitude/longitude numbers and report it to the FWC at the Wildlife Alert number (1-888-404-3922).
“Our officers can check it,” said Cooper. “If it’s an illegal trap, we can start investigating it or we can destroy it.”

Gulf of Mexico Traps to Phase Out in 2007
Fish trap use in all federal waters of the eastern Gulf of Mexico is scheduled to be phased out completely in 2007. However, because of so many outlaw trappers, the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council’s Law Enforcement Advisory Panel has recommended that the council either speed up the phase-out plan, or implement VMS (Vessel Monitoring Systems) requirements for commercial fishermen in the area.
CCA Florida has long been concerned that as the phase-out approaches, the commercial industry will make an appeal to allow trapping to continue. Marine conservationists may have to take a strong stand when the issue eventually appears before the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council.

MORE PHOTOS OF FISH TRAPS


[return to Table of Contents]

Manatee Downlisting Decision Postponed

by Ted Forsgren, CCA Florida Executive Director

The FWC has decided once again to postpone a decision on whether or not manatees should remain on the state’s endangered species list.

When the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) completed a long-overdue study on manatee status earlier this year, they concluded that the animal would be more properly classified as a “threatened” rather than an “endangered” species under criteria the agency uses to classify imperiled species. However, Commissioners indicated at their May meeting that they want to ensure they have a grasp of all the best scientific information available before they make a final decision.

“CCA Florida remains confident that the Commission has all the best available information on-hand to make their decision,” said Dr. Ernie Hendry, CCA Florida past chairman. “However, it’s an important decision, so there’s no real objection to their spending a little more time evaluating the data.”

FWC Vice Chairman Rodney Barreto noted that scientists at the Florida Marine Research Institute have prepared the most comprehensive evaluation of the manatee’s biological status ever assembled. “We do not see any evidence that the manatee population is in immediate jeopardy,” said Barreto, adding that nothing indicates manatees are in danger of extinction within the next 100 years. In addition, he said that current data, both scientific and anecdotal, indicate the manatee population has increased since the 1970s.

“The state of Florida has done a great job of protecting manatees, and they should be congratulated for all they’ve done,” said Barreto, who pointed out that more than 250,000 acres of manatee protection zones have already been established—roughly 24 percent of the state’s inland and coastal waters.

Commissioners voted to allow FWC staff to continue evaluating information and feedback until their September meeting and to consider taking action to move on to the final step to downlist the species not later than November.

Management plan required
The final phase of the process of downlisting manatees is preparation of a management plan, which will detail protection measures. Completion of the plan is a required step for any change in species’ classification on the imperiled species list.

“Establishing the correct biological status and implementing the management plan is essential to determining whether existing regulations are sufficient to protect the expanding manatee populations,” said CCA’s Hendry. “Otherwise, as saltwater anglers, we’ll continue to face a never ending procession of additional zones and regulations based on lawsuits and emotions, instead of science.”

It’s also important to note that the FWC’s action represents the status of Florida manatees in May 2003, not 50 years from now. Added Hendry, “The FWC and federal agencies don’t need to wait another 31 years to do a comprehensive assessment, which is how long it’s been since the initial status review. A good deal of the hype and hysteria over the listing criteria and future management decisions would be eliminated if the re-evaluations are done every three to five years as is the case for many other species.”

[return to Table of Contents]

CCA Disputes NMFS’ Procedure for Testing “Surface” Trolling in Deep Water Grouper Preserves

by Ted Venker, CCA National

In a matter that could have far-reaching consequences for recreational anglers everywhere, Coastal Conservation Association finds itself in the unexpected position of debating the definition of “trolling” with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).

CCA maintains that dragging a four-pound weight attached to steel line across the ocean bottom at one or two knots does not constitute trolling. NMFS apparently believes that it does. At stake is whether or not recreational anglers will continue to have access to troll for coastal pelagic species such as mackerel and wahoo over two, one-hundred-square-mile areas currently closed to bottom fishing off west central Florida.

“We have proven that we are willing to accept reasonable regulations to conserve marine resources, but we can’t allow the research that is supposed to support those regulations to be manipulated like this,” said Fred Miller, CCA’s National Government Relations Committee Chairman. “Even people who have no fishing experience should be able to recognize the difference between true trolling and dragging baits on the ocean bottom.”

In 1999, it was determined that the Madison-Swanson and Steamboat Lumps areas are home to significant spawning aggregations of gag grouper. In order to conserve declining numbers of this species, CCA supported efforts to close those areas to bottom fishing. However, when the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council proposed to ban all fishing in the areas, CCA sued, arguing that extending the closure to include trolling for pelagics near the surface was unnecessary to protect grouper residing 200 to 400 feet below the surface.

In a settlement agreement between CCA and NMFS reached in 2001, NMFS agreed not to ban trolling in the closed areas until research could be conducted to determine if it is possible for recreational fishermen trolling for mackerel, wahoo and other coastal pelagic species to catch gag grouper. Although the research could have been conducted any time since the settlement agreement was reached in 2001, NMFS just recently released information describing the “trolling” research methods that had successfully caught gag grouper. Those methods included using heavy weights, steel line and speeds of one to two knots or less to drag the baits along the bottom through the grouper habitat. Not a single coastal pelagic was caught during the research using NMFS “trolling” methods.

“That is not a reasonable method of trolling,” said CCA Executive Committee Member, Alex Jernigan. “The point of the research was not to find any way to catch a gag grouper using the most abnormal means possible. It was to determine if, under normal circumstances, a recreational fisherman trolling for dolphin or other coastal pelagics could catch grouper and clearly the answer is ‘no.’”

The moratorium on gag grouper in the closed areas will expire in July of 2003, and under terms of the settlement agreement, the trolling research must be completed before the closures can be extended. CCA is eager to avoid any lapse in the protection of gag grouper and is urging NMFS to conduct further research using a more realistic definition of trolling before the deadline.

“We are willing to work with NMFS on this issue. CCA is not opposed to closing areas to recreational fishing as long as there is scientific evidence that demonstrates recreational fishing is part of the problem,” said Miller. “We believe the science indicates it is necessary to conserve gag. We simply refuse to be arbitrarily closed out of an area based on faulty research.”

FWC Recognizes Faulty Science
In May, CCA Florida brought the issue to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. The commission consequently voted to support CCA’s position that surface trolling should be allowed in the areas closed to protect grouper stocks.

“Absurd studies like these must be challenged and exposed,” said CCA Florida Executive Director, Ted Forsgren. “Otherwise they will be used to prohibit types of recreational fishing that have absolutely no impact whatsoever on grouper and snapper.”

[return to Table of Contents]

Panhandle Wildlife Officers Recover a Half-Mile of Hidden Gillnets

July 1 marks the eighth anniversary of implementation of Florida’s net ban, but some poachers still haven’t gotten the message.


Following a citizen’s tip, wildlife officers recently recovered an estimated 1000 yards of monofilament and nylon gillnets from coastal waters in Wakulla County, south of Tallahassee.

According to Bubba Joyner, an officer with the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, an individual reported seeing a gillnet in Apalachee Bay east of the St. Marks Lighthouse. When Joyner and officer Stan Tucker went to the area by airboat, they found five nets hidden in the salt marsh under canvas and palm fronds. Some of the nets were brand new.

While there, a recreational angler came up and reported seeing a large net roughly two miles offshore. With the aide of GPS coordinates, they were able to locate the abandoned net, which was full of dead fish including hammerhead sharks, blacktip sharks, speckled trout, pinfish and catfish. It took officers two days to gather all the nets and entangled fish, which filled the beds of two FWC trucks.

“The unfortunate thing is these nets will keep on killing fish as long as they remain in the water,” said Lt. Jeff Schremser, the FWC’s patrol supervisor for Franklin and Wakulla counties.

In July 2002, wildlife officers discovered nine illegal gillnets totaling 4,500 feet in the waters off Wakulla and Franklin counties.

Wildlife Alert
Anyone who sees a gillnet being used in state waters should call the Wildlife Alert hotline at 1-888-404-3922. Callers may remain anonymous and if the call leads to an arrest the caller can receive a reward up to $1000.

[return to Table of Contents]

Net Case Killed in Appeals Court

The First District Court of Appeals in Tallahassee has reversed a circuit court ruling and vacated a declaratory judgement from a Wakulla County circuit court that basically sought to reintroduce gillnets into state waters. The original lawsuit filed more than a year ago had claimed that the so-called “Pringle-Crum” net, a 500-square-foot net with 3-inch stretch mesh, was legal under the constitutional netting restrictions because it was a “rectangular net” and not a seine net or a gillnet. The appeals court ruled that the plaintiffs in the case failed to exhaust administrative remedies with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission before turning to the courts.

[return to Table of Contents]

Commission Adopts Rules to Close Loopholes in Gillnet Regulations

The FWC has adopted needed measures to control illegal netting in Florida waters. Effective July 1, the new rule amendments clarify Florida’s net transit laws which were created to implement the constitutional netting prohibitions. The laws prohibit the transport of gillnets in state waters (unless the transport of such nets is direct, continuous and expeditious from where the vessel is moored to where the use of such nets is legal). Prior to the change, a Martin County judge had issued a decision that the net transit laws applied only to the vessel carrying the nets and not the netter.

Another rule change addresses the widespread use of “toy boats” by commercial seine netters to increase the number of nets that can be legally fished at one time. CCA Florida raised the issue of too many nets being used by individual commercial operations and the use of “toy boats” to circumvent the net ban in its 1999 report on the status of net ban law enforcement.

Although the previous law permitted an unlimited number of seine nets on board a boat, only two could be fished at any one time. A number of years ago, however, commercial netters began carrying “toy boats” and other “vessels” (such as plastic trays and even a car top carrier) so they could circumvent the two-net rule.

The new rule specifies that any auxiliary vessels used in conjunction with a primary vessel must be commercially registered and be eight feet long or longer. The rule also now prohibits possession of more than four seines aboard a vessel (including the primary vessel and any other vessel being transported or towed).

CCA Florida is also working to get increased, felony level penalties for major netting violations. Under current Florida law it’s a felony to “molest” a crab trap, but only a misdemeanor, for instance, to use an illegal gillnet to take thousands of pounds of Spanish mackerel in state waters.

[return to Table of Contents]

Pompano Rule Changes Postponed

At its meeting in May, the FWC postponed final action until fall on proposed pompano rule amendments. The commissioners directed their staff to schedule an additional public workshop and to re-evaluate the effects of increasing minimum size to 11 inches on the recreational and commercial fishery.

CCA Florida has stated at each previous pompano hearing that if the FWC would simply control the illegal netting of pompano no actions would be needed to reduce the take of legal fishers. However, control of illegal netting remains an elusive task for the FWC and thus further restrictions are being placed on the legal recreational and commercial fishers.

CCA Florida supported an increase in minimum size from 10 inches to 11 inches for pompano for both recreational and commercial fisheries. CCA does not support proposals to reduce bag limits and trip limits because by-catch allowances and other loopholes can be used by illegal fishers to exceed limits, whereas a prohibition on possession and sale of undersize pompano (similar to the FWC’s current regulations on groupers and snappers) cannot be circumvented.

CCA also supported an FWC staff recommendation to eliminate the special permit establishing a federal waters gillnet fishery. Previous claims by CCA that there is no legitimate gillnet fishery in federal waters has been proven correct.

In the more than two years that the FWC has been dealing with this issue only two netters have shown observers that they can gillnet pompano in federal waters. CCA maintains that the program simply encourages illegal netting in state waters.

The lack of participation in the special federal waters gillnet permit program also clearly demonstrates that the only legitimate pompano commercial fishery in Florida is the commercial hook and line fishery.

CCA also recommends that the commercial trip limit for pompano be reduced to 200 pounds. That position is based on a trip ticket analysis by the Florida Marine Research Institute which shows that 97.5 percent of the commercial hook and line gear trips for pompano landed less than 200 pounds.

[return to Table of Contents]

Spiny Lobster Rule Changes

The FWC has approved several spiny lobster rule amendments which take effect in July. The rule changes include the elimination of the 24-lobster vessel limit from the regular season recreational bag limit (only the six-lobster per person daily limit will apply), and reduction of the bag limit during the two-day sport lobster season in Biscayne National Park from 12 to six lobsters per person per day. It also phases out the higher recreational bag limit for persons holding the Special Recreational Crawfish License by the 2012-13 season.

CCA opposed all of the reductions in recreational bag limits because current regulations do not limit in any way the daily, trip or seasonal take of the commercial lobster fishery. In fact, the commercial trap fishery kills and wastes almost as many pounds of sublegal lobster as bait in traps than the total pounds of lobster allocated to the entire recreational fishery.

[return to Table of Contents]

Legislative Initiatives Support Anglers and Boaters

CCA worked hard during a difficult budget year to maintain $600,000 in funding to continue Florida’s artificial reef program. Operated by the Marine Fisheries Division of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), the program provides grants to state organizations and local governments for siting, material acquisition, deployment and study of artificial reefs. An additional $194,000 was included as funding for low-profile reefs being developed off of Steinhatchee in the Gulf of Mexico.

Another legislative success, passage of SB 2586, was achieved largely through the efforts of the Marine Industries Association of Florida and other boating organizations. CCA Florida also supported the legislation which redirects a portion of marine fuel tax dollars (about $12 million) to the FWC for the creation of the Office of Boating and Waterways. The funds will be used to expand much needed on-the-water enforcement, boater education and compliance, and law enforcement operations.

Better enforcement of current manatee zones, for instance, can help prevent the need to establish additional zones. Funds can also be used to create more boat ramps and improve access for saltwater anglers. Although boating has a $14 billion economic impact in this state, this tax, which is collected at marinas, was previously used by the Department of Transportation for road building projects.

Senate Bill 2586 is currently on the Governor’s Desk for signature. Members are encouraged to E-mail their support for the bill to jeb@myflorida.com.

[return to Table of Contents]

CCA Florida Mangrove Restoration Continues in the Indian River Lagoon

The CCA Florida Orlando Chapter is launching into another year of mangrove restoration efforts along the Indian River Lagoon. The restoration program is supported by a substantial grant from the FishAmerica Foundation (FAF) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Community Based Habitat Enhancement and Restoration Program
.
This is the second year in a row that FishAmerica and NOAA have funded the major restoration project. This year’s grant was supplemented by matching funds from the Canaveral Port Authority.
“The restoration funding will enable our chapter members and other concerned citizens to continue the effort begun in 2002 with the initial grant,” said Doug Blanton, a member of the Orlando Chapter. “That program resulted in the successful planting of 23,000 mangrove seedlings at the Canaveral Tidal Pool Park in Brevard County.”

The mangroves were planted during a number of organized “planting days” by volunteers from CCA Florida, Boeing Aerospace, the Backcountry Flyfishing Association of Central Florida, students from Rockledge and Titusville High Schools and citizens of all ages.

This year’s effort will include selected saltmarsh vegetation plantings to complement the mangrove restoration projects.

For the past decade, hundreds of CCA Florida members have contributed thousands of volunteer hours to help restore Florida’s marine habitat. For example, in the Tampa Bay Ecosystem, with support from the Duckwall Foundation and FAF, volunteers have worked for years with Tampa BayWatch to build oyster bars and plant literally hundreds of acres of saltmarsh.

“With support from foundations and local chapters we’ve been able to do more than just talk about habitat restoration,” said Mark Carter, CCA Florida Vice President. “We’ve been able to get out there and do something about it.”

For more information on CCA Florida’s habitat restoration efforts or other conservation initiatives go to www.ccaflorida.org.

Plantings on TV
In March, one of the restoration plantings was taped by the Outdoor Channel for the cable channel’s program “Focus Outdoors.” The show recorded volunteers planting mangroves and cord grass raised by the students of Rockledge High School. Chapter members were also interviewed about the restoration project. The show aired four times during the month of June.

Following the planting, Capt. Doug Blanton took Johanna DeGroff of the FishAmerica Foundation near an area previously planted with mangroves. She caught her first ever redfish, a 13-pounder on 8-pound test.


[Return to Table of Contents] [Return to CCA Florida home page] [Return to list of SeaWatch publications]

 

 
 


Thank You

Mercury Marine Outboards
We are deeply appreciative of Mercury Marine for their continued support of CCA Florida
conservation initiatives. Mercury provides motors at a discounted cost for every CCA Florida banquet. The motors are used to raise significant and vital funds for the protection of our marine resources.

CCA Florida would also like to recognize:

FLORIDA SPORTSMAN MAGAZINE and the WICKSTROM FAMILY for their generous support for our membership growth program and their work for marine conservation in Florida.

CALUSA CAST NETS and CRACKER CAST NETS for their consistent and longtime support of marine conservation through donated and discounted cast nets provided for every CCA Florida fundraising banquet.

THE ORVIS COMPANY who continues to make a significant annual donation of merchandise to CCA Florida.

[Click here to see our 2003 Banquet Schedule.]