
Table
of Contents:

Major
Netting Bust Makes Case for Stronger Penalties
by
Rick Farren, Communications Director of CCA Florida
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission officers arrested two commercial
fishermen in the largest illegal inshore fisheries case ever made in Lee and
Charlotte counties. The officers seized nearly 6,000 pounds of illegally-caught
mullet and 900 yards of monofilament gill net from a lagoon on the Gulf side
of Cayo Costa Island in December.
The recent arrests were made during a detail targeting illegal commercial
fishing operations in the Matlacha and Cayo Costa areas. When officers attempted
to stop and inspect the suspects vessel, the two fishermen jumped from
the vessel, ran ashore, stripped off their fishing apparel and ran barefoot
down the beach, straight to another officer, who made the arrests.

These types of major violations, and the continued problems with repeat
offenders, will only be reduced if the legislature passes stronger penalties
for net ban violations, said Ted Forsgren, CCA Florida Executive Director.
For more than a year, CCA Florida has been actively seeking stronger penalties
to curb ongoing net poaching activities in state waters. (See
2004 Legislature to Consider Stronger Netting Penalties.)
Currently, it's a felony to molest a crab trap in state
waters, but only a misdemeanor to illegally-harvest thousands of pounds of
fish, said Forsgren.
A check of the vessel revealed a large amount of mullet and a gill net still
half deployed. The fish and gill net remaining in the water were so heavy
it took officers 17 hours to recover and dispose of the illegal catch.
One of the commercial fishermen arrested is a habitual offender of the states
constitutional ban on the use of entanglement nets in state waters and other
fisheries-related offenses. In October, he was charged, along with four other
Lee County residents, with scheming to defraud the state through the illegal
sale of $100,000 worth of saltwater products. He was also arrested and convicted
in Manatee County in September 2001 and on June 26, 2003, he was arrested
by FWC officers for net-transit violations.
A sampling of other netting incidents over the past few months clearly indicates
the need for stronger penalties:
In April 2003, 600 yards of gill net along with permit, sheepshead, black
drum, snook, bonefish and redfish were confiscated in Collier County from
a blacked-out skiff by FWC law enforcement officers. Also in April,
a net limitation detail in Manatee County encountered a group of fishing vessels
that fled as the officers approached. One netter was caught with a 500-yard
gill net. A night flight that same month resulted in the confiscation of a
650-yard monofilament net.
|
In May, FWC officers confiscated 1,400 yards of monofilament and nylon
gill nets from coastal waters of Franklin and Wakulla counties. The previous
spring officers discovered 1,500 yards of hidden gill nets.
In June, 300 yards of hidden gill nets were discovered in Wakulla County.
In July, two fishermen were caught with 5,855 square feet of illegal seine
nets.
In August, 800 yards of abandoned monofilament gill net was found in Wakulla
County.
In September, 1,086 pounds of mullet and 200 yards of monofilament gill
net were confiscated in Franklin County. In Levy County an abandoned gill
net with oversized mesh was discovered with an entangled and dead, 100-pound
sea turtle.
In October, a covert detail in Bay County arrested nine individuals, and
recovered 13,000 square feet of seine nets and 4,000 pounds of ladyfish
and Spanish mackerel.
In November, three gill nets, including one containing rotting fish, were
discovered by flight surveillance.
In December in Manatee County, an il-legal, 2,210-square-foot seine net
was confiscated. In Citrus County a 2000-square-foot gill net and a quantity
of mullet were seized. In Taylor County a 1,250-square-foot monofilament
gill net was confiscated.
In January 2004, a suspect in Lee County was caught using two, 2,000-square-foot
seine nets. Three netters were caught with a 400-yard gill net and 1,800
pounds of mullet and two violators were caught with a 600-yard gill
net. In Citrus County, 200 pounds of mullet and 2,900 square feet of
seine net were confiscated. In Taylor County, a 300-yard monofilament
trammel net was discovered hidden at the coast.
[return to Table of
Contents]
CCA
Florida Proposes Alternatives to Biscayne National Park No Motor Zones
by Ted Fosgren
Biscayne National Park contains some of the finest saltwater recreational
fishing areas in Florida. Its location in highly urbanized southeast Florida
also makes it an extremely valuable component of Flo-ridas $4.5
billion saltwater recreational fishery. High recreational usage is one
of the major values and benefits of the park, but such recreational use
can create both management challenges and opportunities. In recent years,
some groups and managers have been promoting no-entry and
no-fishing zones as a means to protect natural resources.
Such measures have been proposed even before more reasonable and proven
measures have been tried.
The real challenge to park managers is to not shut down access, but rather
to work cooperatively with recreational fishers to develop plans which
provide access as well as resource protection.
The most important action park managers can make is to use the recently-formed
Biscayne National Park Fishery Working Group to make specific recommendations
and modifications on the proposed zones in the parks preferred alternative.
Local knowledge and local buy-in is critical to the success of the plan
and the Fishery Working Group contains diverse and knowledgeable local
interests.
Such groups have previously been used by the National Park Service in
Florida to develop access and resource protection plans. For example,
about 10 years ago, Ft. DeSoto National Park, Pinellas County, and knowledgeable
local anglers and guides developed a successful plan which provided seagrass
and manatee protection and access for various types of fishing.
At a recent meeting of the Biscayne Fishery Working Group, park staff
stated that, according to creel surveys, 40-45 percent of the mutton and
yellowtail snapper taken in the park are undersize. Such information demonstrates
that the park already has a serious enforcement and public information
problem. Adding more regulations with complex zones and areas is not going
to provide any real benefits unless the existing enforcement and public
information problems are resolved. Using the local Working Group can help
by enhancing local buy-in and voluntary compliance.
Access Restriction
Zones in the Draft Alternatives
CCA firmly believes that no-fishing/no-entry zones should be the last,
not the first, management option pursued. However, four of the five management
alternatives proposed by the park contain increasingly larger no-combustion
engine zones. The size, management and configuration of many of
these zones will make them defacto no-fishing zones. We feel that the
park should modify these zones to provide access corridors for reasonable
on plane boat speeds or slow-speed zones, or reduce the overall
size of the zones. The local Working Group can easily provide specific
recommendations along these lines.
For example, the no-combustion engine zones in the Arsenicker Keys area
in two of the alternatives are 2-miles wide in some areas. In addition,
the Featherbed Bank no-combustion engine zone is about 1.5 square miles.
Such zones would effectively eliminate most recreational fishing.
Not everyone has the financial means to afford a boat with a poling platform
and/or electric trolling motors. Even with such equipment, poling or electric
trolling for 2 miles in and 2 miles out of an area is very difficult or
even impossible under some wind and tide situations. We recommend that
much of these zones be eliminated and/or modified to slow speed
with some designated higher speed access corridors. Such designations
would allow use of a combustion engine while still providing protection
for seagrasses and other resources.
Two of the five alternatives contain access by permit only
zones. CCA Florida does not support this concept. It is unclear from the
parks proposals who or what would be allowed and who would be excluded.
In addition, the current enforcement problems indicate that such measures
would be extremely difficult to implement. Thus, any possible benefits
from such zones are highly questionable.
For more information, and to view maps of the proposed zones, go to www.nps.gov/bisc/,
then click on Management Docs.
More information on CCAs position on Marine
Protected Areas.
[return to Table
of Contents]
NMFS
Abandons Important Conservation Initiative in Dolphin Fishery Plan
In a shocking move, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has
removed critical conservation measures, including commercial trip limits,
from a federal management plan for dolphin and wahoo, despite the plans
unanimous passage by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council.
The plan as originally developed by the Councils is exactly the
way fishery management should work. It fixed the problems before any had
a chance to develop, said Fred Miller, chairmen of CCAs Government
Relations Committee. With the stroke of a pen, NMFS has essentially
told the entire Council system that it should not pursue precautionary
measures in fisheries management and should instead try to salvage a stock
after it is too late.
In developing the plan, the South Atlantic Council, in conjunction with
the Mid-Atlantic and New England councils, had recognized that the vast
majority of dolphin are caught by recreational fishermen and stipulated
that management should be designed primarily to benefit the recreational
fishery.
For more than a decade, conservationists have voiced concerns that the
commercial longline industrys intense fishing effort could shift
to traditional recreational species like dolphin and wahoo after regulations
were implemented in traditionally commercial pelagic fisheries. To prevent
the expansion of a directed commercial longline fishery for dolphin, the
South Atlantic Council plan included a commercial trip limit of 3,000
pounds off of North and South Carolina and 1,000 pounds off of Georgia
and Florida. Additionally, a control date of May 21, 1999, was adopted
to limit entry into the fishery. The NMFS action to remove the commercial
trip limits and the control date from the plan came more than three years
after the plan was submitted by the Councils.
Initially, we were very encouraged by the Councils proactive
proposal to protect this important recreational fishery, said Michael
Kennedy, CCA Florida Chairman. However, the NMFS decision
now makes this fishery vulnerable to exploitation by the commercial longline
industry.
In the late 1990s, CCA Florida worked closely with state chapters in North
Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, and with CCA National staff to create
strong grass-roots support for CCA recommendations on dolphin management.
Although many of CCAs recommendations were incorporated into the
final plan, the primary objectives were to stop commercial longlines from
directly targeting dolphin and protect the longstanding status of the
dolphin fishery as an overwhelmingly recreational fishery.
CCA has relentlessly pursued a solution to the problems caused by
longlining. Unfortunately, this action reduces the overall conservation
benefit of the plan, said David Cummins, CCA president. This
is a step backward for conservation-minded management and CCA will not
let it go unchallenged.
[return to Table
of Contents]
Ghost
Net Found off St. Lucie Inlet
An abandoned gill net containing hundreds of dead sharks and other fish
and a loggerhead sea turtle was discovered eight miles off St. Lucie Inlet
near Stuart in January.
A Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) helicopter located
the 250-yard gill net and directed a patrol boat to the site. Divers and
special agents from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) assisted in the recovery.
Retrieving this net was a priority for us, NOAA special agent
Jeff Radonski said. The potential for even more incidental killing
of sharks, sea turtles and fish was tremendous.
Law enforcement officers have appealed to the public for help in tracking
down the owner of the gill net.
Anyone with information can contact the FWCs toll-free Wildlife
Alert Hotline at (888) 404-FWCC or *FWC on a cellular phone (#FWC in some
areas) or call NOAA Fisheries at (321) 269-0004. Callers to the FWCs
number can remain anonymous and may qualify for a reward. [PHOTOS]
[return to Table
of Contents]
Marine
Conservation Initiatives for 2004
In February, CCA Floridas Board of Directors approved the organizations
2004 Fisheries Conservation Work Plan. Following are highlights of that
plan. For more information on any of CCA
Florida conservation initiatives, or contact the Tallahassee advocacy
office at (850) 224-3474.
Net Ban Enforcement
CCA Florida will continue to support stronger net ban enforcement efforts
throughout the year by documenting poaching operations and highlighting
major netting arrests. During the 2004 legislative session, CCA will be
working for passage of an FWC-recommended increase in penalties for major
netting violations from a misdemeanor to a felony, the same penalty that
currently exists for molesting a crab trap in state waters.
The CCA Board also approved initiation of a program to address the use
of so-called cast gill nets, which are being used to entangle
Spanish mackerel on Floridas southeast coast. Opposition will also
continue to commercial industry lawsuits seeking to allow the use of 500-square-foot
gill nets with unlimited mesh size.
Saltwater
Fishing AccessMarine Protected Areas
CCA will continue to oppose large-scale and arbitrary marine no-take,
no-fishing reserves while advocating for more effective, proven
fisheries management measures. Alternatives are being prepared to plans
by Biscayne National Park to develop large, no-motor zones in Biscayne
Bay that affectively prevent most fishing access.
Recommendations by the South Atlantic Council will be monitored to insure
anglers concerns are considered.
Support will also continue for the CCA-sponsored Freedom to Fish Act which
has been introduced in the 108th Congress.
CCA's Position on Marine Protected
Areas.
Bluewater
Campaign
Final passage of the long-awaited federal Dolphin and Wahoo Management
Plan failed to include commercial bag limits that would have prevented
development of a major commercial dolphin longline fishery. In 2004, CCA
will seek to reintroduce those measures to insure protection of the species
and to maintain the traditional commercial/recreational harvest levels.
In the Gulf of Mexico, CCA is seeking the reconsideration of a dolphin
management plan by the Gulf Council.
Fisheries
Management Plans and Regulations
CCA will seek additional FWC rules to close poaching loopholes in the
commercial pompano fishery, and protect permit with a size and boat limit
similar to rules that currently govern cobia take. Joining with CCA National,
CCA Florida will seek stronger Gulf Council controls on commercial gag
and red grouper, and red snapper harvest in the Gulf of Mexico. Recommendations
by the South Atlantic Council regarding grouper, snapper and amberjack
rules will also be monitored.
Legislature
2004
In addition to seeking tougher net ban violation penalties, CCA will work
with legislators to ensure the proper, mandated use of recreational saltwater
fishing license monies. Other specific FWC budget items receiving support
include $600,000 for continued state-wide artificial reef construction,
and funding for the saltwater redfish hatchery at Port Manatee.
CCA Florida's 2004 Legislative
Updates.
Saltwater
Fishing AccessManatee Zones
CCA will be working with the FWC on implementing measurable biological
goals to require manatee protection and management by science instead
of lawsuits and emotion. CCA staff will also review and comment on FWC
manatee protection plans as they relate to saltwater fishing access.
CCA Florida's position on Manatee
Protection and Angler Access
|